Small bowel obstruction: an unusual cause.

MJ Steven and A Jabaar.

Department of General Surgery, Stirling Royal Infirmary, Stirling  

Corresponding author: Mairi Steven, Department of General Surgery, Stirling Royal Infirmary.  Email: mairisteven@doctors.org.uk

 

 Abstract

A bezoar is a tightly packed collection of partially digested or undigested material.  When this material is vegetable matter it is known as a phytobezoar, when it is hair it is a trichobezoar and when it is medication a pharmacobezoar.  Phytobezoars are a known cause of small bowel obstruction in patients who have had previous gastric surgery.  Two cases of small bowel obstruction caused by phytobezoars are discussed in patients with no risk factors.  The cause, clinical features and management of phytobezoars is reviewed in an attempt to increase awareness of this unusual cause of small bowel obstruction.

  Keywords: Small bowel obstruction, aetiology, phytobezoars

 

Case report

The first case is that of a 58-year-old man who presented with a four-day history of colicky abdominal pain, vomiting and constipation.  His past medical history was unremarkable and he had had no previous abdominal surgery.  He was not on any medication and denied any unusual diet.  On examination his abdomen was distended and generally tender, but not peritonitic.  Bowel sounds were tinkling.  Plain abdominal X-ray showed multiple loops of distended small bowel with fluid levels.  Blood results showed a leucocytosis, but no other abnormality.  A nasogastric tube was placed and he was fluid resuscitated.

 

The following day his condition had not improved and he was taken to theatre.  At laparotomy a mass was found in the terminal ileum with an adjacent enlarged mesenteric lymph node.  This was thought to be a polypoidal growth in the lumen of the ileum.  The proximal small bowel was distended and oedematous.  A small bowel resection was performed, removing 10 inches of ileum.  A primary sutured anastomosis was performed.  The patient’s post-operative recovery was unremarkable and he was discharged home eight days later.

 

Histopathology, however, revealed oedematous mucosa and in the strictured area a 25x 25x 10mm piece of partly digested vegetable material.  Deep ulceration was seen at the site of obstruction, which was in keeping with food impaction.  This is shown in Figure 1.  There was no evidence of chronic inflammation, fibrosis or malignancy and no hair was seen. 

Figure 1: This slide shows a section of small intestine with deep ulceration surrounded by fibrin, in-keeping with food impaction

 

 

The second case is that of a 72-year-old man with a three-day history of abdominal pain, vomiting and constipation.  His past medical history included hypertension and a previous appendicectomy for proven acute appendicitis.  On examination, his abdomen was soft and not distended.  Bowel sounds were normal.  Abdominal x-ray showed multiple loops of small bowel and a CT scan of his abdomen confirmed dilated loops of small bowel as far as the right iliac fossa.  At laparotomy dilated and oedematous loops of small bowel were found down to the terminal ileum where there was a compressible mass.  An enterotomy was performed and a mass shown in Figure 2 was removed.  The mucosa of the ileum looked slightly inflamed at the site of impaction.  No mucosal biopsy was taken, but pathology of the material showed this to be a mass of vegetable skin.  The patient denied any unusual diet.  His post-operative recovery was unremarkable and he was allowed home. 

 

Figure 2: Mass of vegetable skin retrieved from terminal ileum

 

Discussion

Phytobezoars are concretions of vegetable matter found in the gastrointestinal tract.  They are very uncommon, however, it has been reported that they account for 2% of all small bowel obstruction.1  The incidence of gastric phytobezoars compared to small bowel phytobezoars is unclear.  One Canadian series found over a 10 year period 16 patients with phytobezoars, 7 small bowel and 9 gastric.2 Risk factors include eating bulky vegetables, most commonly persimmons, insulin dependent diabetes mellitus, H2-antagonists and hypothyroidism.2   Most patients (76.3%) have had previous gastric surgery.3  Phytobezoars as well as trichobezoars occur more commonly in children and adolescents and 80% occur in women.  This, therefore, makes these cases more unusual as both patients were men with no history of any gastric surgery, no past medical history of note and were not on any medication.

 

Clinical presentation depends on the size of the concretion and the site.  They include epigastric pain, nausea, vomiting, halitosis, constipation and anorexia.  Diagnosis was previously difficult prior to the widespread use of endoscopy.  CT scanning can also be useful and authors have commented on a “mottled” intraluminal mass being indicative of a phytobezoar.4 

 

The management of a phytobezoar may be operative or non-operative.  Both these cases were managed operatively; however, conservative measures can be employed.  These include, nasogastric suctioning and lavage or endoscopic removal depending on the site.  Enzymatic therapy and metaclopramide can be used to improve gastric emptying in the case of gastric phytobezoars.

 

In conclusion, phytobezoars are a very rare cause of small bowel obstruction.  There are several risk factors, the most common being previous gastric surgery.  These cases highlight that although risk factors should prompt the surgeon to consider a phytobezoar, it can occur in their absence. 

 

References:

  1. Lo CY, Lau PW Small bowel phytobezoars: an uncommon cause of small bowel obstruction. Aust N Z J Surg. 1994; 64(3): 187-9.

  2. Hayes PG, Rotstein OD Gastrointestinal Phytobezoars: Presentation and Management. Canadian Journal of Surgery 1986; 29: 419-420.

  3. Escamilla C, Robles-Campos R, Parrilla-Paricio P et al Intestinal obstruction and bezoars. Journal of the American College of Surgeons 1994; 179: 285-288.

  4. Ripolles T, Garcia-Aguayo J, Martinez MJ, Gil P Gastrointestinal bezoars: sonographic and CT characteristics. American Journal of Roentgenology 2001; 177 (1): 65-69.

Back to August Contents