‘Haematuria’: A case of mistaken identity.

McArdle KA1, Ray D2.

1.  Department Of Surgery,  New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton,  West Midlands,WV4 5HN.

2.  Dept of Urology,  Russells Hall Hospital,  Dudley, West Midlands,  Dy1 2HQ.

Correspondence to: Miss Kirsten A McArdle, Department Of Surgery, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton,West Midlands,WV4 5HN.

e-mail kirstenmcardle@hotmail.co.uk

SMJ 2008 53(2): 66

Abstract:

Although haematuria is the commonest cause of red urine, it is important to recognise that it is not the only cause.  We report the case of a 62 year old lady with a prosthetic heart valve who presented to the haematuria service with red urine resulting from haemolysis secondary to a peri-valvular leak.


Case Report:

A 62 year old lady presented to the rapid access haematuria clinic with a seven day history of passing red urine.  She had no other urinary symptoms or pain and denied passing blood clots in her urine. She did however complain of general fatigue, loss of appetite and some weight loss over the preceding weeks. There was no previous history of haematuria or urological disease. Her past medical history included a mitral valve replacement, for which she was taking warfarin.

 

A urine sample taken at the clinic was bright red in colour.  Urine dipstick was strongly positive for the presence of blood.  Initial laboratory investigations found her to be anaemic with a haemoglobin of 7.7g/dl. Her renal function was found to be normal and her INR was within the normal therapeutic range for valve protection.

 

A flexible cystoscopy revealed normal bladder mucosa.  A CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis failed to show any abnormalities. Laboratory urine cytometry and culture showed no evidence of infection and urine cytology showed no evidence of malignant cells.

 

Despite these negative findings, the patient continued to pass red urine and drop her haemoglobin concentration. Her warfarin therapy was therefore stopped and further investigations arranged.  She underwent an immunological screen, renal angiography, bilateral ureteroscopy and retrograde pyelography.  However, these investigations also failed to demonstate any abnormalities.

 

Further blood analyses showed a rise in serum lactate dehydrogenase and a fall in serum haptoglobin. Her bilirubin was also found to be mildly elevated.  More detailed inspection of the urine at microscopy showed 0-1 erythrocytes per high-powered field, 20-30% of which were dysmorphic.  This pattern of results suggested the presence of intra-vascular haemolysis.

 

An echocardiogram was performed.  This confirmed significant mitral regurgitation. The patient was prepared for a redo-mitral valve replacement. At surgical exploration, a perivalvular leak was found and repaired. Following this procedure, the urine returned to a normal colour and the anaemia resolved. The patient made a good post operative recovery and was discharged home. She has not had any further episodes of pigmented urine.

 

Discussion:

It is essential for all patients who present with apparent haematuria to undergo full investigation the urinary tract. Haematuria is the commonest cause of red coloured urine.  However, it is not the only cause.  For example, it is well recognised that ingestion of beetroot1 and certain drugs such as metronidazole, L-dopa and rifampicin2 can lead to a reddish discolouration of the urine. Furthermore, haemoglobinuria resulting from haemolysis or the urinary excretion of myoglobin after trauma can mimic frank haematuria3.  It is important to recognise that urinary dipstick testing for blood is often positive in these other conditions and does not necessarily indicate the presence of red blood cells.

 

There is a high incidence of intravascular haemolysis associated with mechanical prosthetic cardiac valves. In the majority of cases this becomes apparent in the first few months following insertion of the prosthesis4.  Studies have suggested that up to 26% of patients with mechanical heart valves develop subclinical haemolysis in the first 12 months post operatively. This is suggested by rising LDH levels and falling serum haptoglobin levels5.  Significant haemolysis is usually an indicator of a perivalvular leak. When the haemolysis becomes severe, free haemoglobin exceeds the haptoglobin binding capacity and is excreted in the urine. If levels are high enough, this can result in deeply pigmented urine mimicking frank haematuria.

 

This case highlights the importance of performing a formal urine microscopy rather than relying on urine dipstick to make a diagnosis of haematuria. The absence of abnormal numbers of erythrocytes in the urine should alert clinicians to the possibility of a diagnosis other than haematuria. Therefore, this simple test is essential in establishing the correct diagnosis and avoiding unnecessary and sometimes invasive urinary tract investigations.

 

In summary, it is important for clinicians to be aware that red coloured urine is not always caused by haematuria.  If no urinary tract pathology is identified, it is important to consider intravascular haemolysis as a potential cause of red coloured urine, especially in patients who have prosthetic heart valves.

 

References: 

1.  Pearcy RM, Mitchell SC, Smith RL. Beetroot and red urine.  Biochem Soc Trans. 1992 Feb;20(1):22S  

2.  Snider DE Jr, Farer LS.  Rifampin and red urine.  JAMA. 1977 Oct 10;238(15):1628. 

3.  Kreder KJ Jr and Williams RD.  Urologic Laboratory Examination.  Tanagho EA, McAninch JW (Editors),  Smiths General Urology (16th Edition)

Lange Medical Books/ McGraw-Hill 2004: 49-61. 

4.  Mecozzi G, Milano AD, De Carlo M, Surrentino F, Pratali S, Nardi C, Borotolli U.  Intravascular haemolysis in patients with new generation prosthetic heart valves: a prospective study.  J.Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg, 2002 Mar, 123(3) 550-6 

5.  Lam,BK, Cosgrove DM, Bhudia SK, Gillinov AM.  Haemolysis after mitral valve repair: mechanisms and treatment.  Ann Thoracic Surg 2005 Feb; 79(2): 754

 

Back to May Contents