Presence of Herpes Simplex Virus in the Oral Mucosa in Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy 

M Djuric1, D Pavlica2, L Jankovic2, J Milasin2 , T Jovanovic3 

1 Clinic of Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Novi Sad, Novi Sad, Serbia

2 School of Dentistry, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia

3 School of Medicine, University of Belgrade, Belgrade, Serbia 

Correspondence to :Dr Milanko Djuric Clinic of Dentistry, School of Medicine Hajduk Veljkova 12 21000 Novi Sad Serbia Email- mdjuric@eunet.yu

SMJ 2006 52(1): 28-31

 

Abstract

Background

The aim of this study was to confirm the presence of herpes simplex virus type 1 and 2 on the oral mucosa, in patients undergoing chemotherapy, by means of polymerase chain reaction - PCR.

Methods

The research was carried out on 40 patients receiving chemotherapy as treatment for different malignancies. The status of oral mucosa and viral presence were assessed in all patients at the initial examination (prior to chemotherapy), and at the control examination (two weeks after the initiation of the chemotherapeutic cycle).

Results

The presence of HSV-1 was detected in 28 patients (70%) prior to chemotherapy, of whom 7 (25%) manifested oral complications. The control examination showed the presence of HSV-1 in 35 patients (87.5%), of whom 23 (65.7%) presented oral mucosa changes. HSV-2 has not been detected in any of the patients.

  

Introduction

Patients receiving chemotherapy commonly develop pathological changes in the oral mucosa. Oral mucositis can occur as a result of direct cytotoxic effect of cytostatics on the oral tissue, but also as a result of underlying immunodeficiency. This immune dysfunction is an enhancing factor for opportunistic infections localised in the oral cavity, the agents being bacteria, fungi or viruses.  Most frequently, oral mucosa damage consists of exanthemas, vesicles, erosions and ulcerations, usually followed by a subjective stinging and burning sensation and pain. 13,8  What is more important is that the mucosal damage is the port of entry for a great number of pathogens. 9,4            Infections caused by herpes simplex virus are very frequent in immunocompromised patients. However, due to a usually atypical clinical picture, they remain mostly unrecognised or misdiagnosed. Due to diminished resistance, herpes simplex virus can easily cause lesions of the oral mucosa, or worsen the already existing damages caused by the stomatotoxic effect of cancer therapy. There is also a possibility of its systemic dissemination followed by numerous changes in the visceral organs.

 

Therefore, sensitive laboratory methods aimed at detecting the presence of the virus in various biological specimens within the shortest possible time should be introduced as routine practice. 2,11

 

Objective

The objective of this study was to confirm the presence of herpes simplex virus, type 1 and 2 (HSV-1, -2) by means of polymerase chain reaction (PCR), on the oral mucosa of patients suffering from various forms of malignancies and receiving chemotherapy.

 

Methods

The study consisted of 40 patients of both sexes and different age, all undergoing chemotherapy. (Table I).

 

Table I.  Classification of Patients Aaccording to Age, Sex and Type of Malignancy

 

Age

Type of malignancy

 

 

Colorectal CA

Acute leukemia

Chronic

leukemia

Breast CA

Head and neck CA

 

m

f

m

f

m

f

m

f

m

f

 

19-29

 

 

3

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3

30-39

 

 

2

5

 

 

 

 

1

1

9

40-49

1

 

3

3

 

 

 

3

 

 

10

50-59

2

1

 

 

 

2

 

 

1

 

6

60-69

5

2

 

3

 

1

 

 

 

 

11

70-79

1

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1

9

3

8

11

 

3

 

3

2

1

40

           

 Clinical study:

Tthe initial clinical examination was done prior to chemotherapy, while the control examination was conducted two weeks after the initiation of the therapy cycle. Clinical tests were done at the Department of Haematology, Institute of Internal Diseases, Clinical Centre in Novi Sad, and at the Institute of Oncology in Sremska Kamenica, Serbia. The oral mucosa status was determined according to the mucositis severity criteria of WHO, which is as follows:

grade 0= None

grade 1= Soreness +/- erythema, no ulceration

grade 2= Ulcers, patient can swallow solid diet

grade 3= Ulcers, extensive erythema, patient cannot swallow solid diet

grade 4= oral mucositis to the extent that the patient cannot swallow

 

Laboratory analysis:

This part of the research was carried out at the Department of Microbiology and Immunology of the School of Medicine in Belgrade, as well as in the Laboratory for Molecular Biology at the School of Dentistry in Belgrade. In order to establish the presence of HSV-1 and 2, swab samples of all patients were taken from soft tissues of the oral cavity, as well as from lesioned sites. The swab samples were sowed in test tubes containing transportation medium (MEM), then each sample was placed in a centrifuge vial, homogenised by vigorous vortex mixing and centrifuged for five minutes at 1200 rpm; the supernatant was poured into sterile test tubes and held at -70ْ until processing.

           

The extraction of potentially present viral DNA was performed by boiling the collected material at 100˚C for ten minutes, after which PCR was applied aiming to confirm the presence of specific viral segments. Primers for HSV-1 (forward 5' -ATA CCG ACG ATA TGC GAC CT and reverse 5' - TTA TTG CCG TCA TAG CGC GG) are specific for the region which encodes  a type-specific  thymidine kinase. The size of the PCR product is 110-bp. HSV-2 specific primer pair for glycoprotein G (forward 5' - TCA GCC CAT CCT CCT TCG GCA GTA and reverse 5' - GAT CTG GTA CTC GAA TGT CTC CG) generated a 183-bp PCR product.3 The reaction mixture in a total volume of 25 μl comprised: 0.2 μM "up-stream" and "down-stream" primers, 10xPCR buffer, 0.2mM  deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate mix, 1 unit of Taq polymerase (Fermentas), 3 μl of sample. The number of amplification cycles was 35, performed in a thermal cycler (PCR Express, Hybaid). The PCR consisted of an initial denaturation of 3 minutes at 94˚ C followed by 35 cycles (denaturation at 94˚ C for 1 min, annealing at 52˚ C for 1 min, and extension for 3 min at 72˚ C) and a final extension of 7 minutes at 72˚ C.

 

PCR products were run on an 8% polyacrilamide gel, stained with ethidium bromide and visualized on a UV transilluminator (Power Station 300 plus, Labnet International, Inc.).

MANOVA and Roy′s t test has been used for statistical analysis.

Results

At the initial examination, 9 out of 40 patients (22.5%) revealed changes in the oral mucosa. Six were suffering from acute leukemia. The severity of mucositis in 3 patients was marked as grade 1, in two patients as grade 2, and in one patient as grade 3. In one patient suffering from chronic leukaemia, pathological conditions of the oral mucosa were observed, and marked as grade 3. At the initial examination, oral mucositis marked as grade 1 was also observed in a female patient suffering from breast cancer, as well as in one patient suffering from head and neck cancer, graded 2 (Table II). The changes on the oral mucosa presented as paleness, petechial haemorrhage, vesicles and erosions.

Table II. Mucositis Severity  at the Initial Clinical Examination According to WHO Criteria 

 

 

Mucositis severity

0

I

II

III

IV

Acute leukaemia

13

3

2

1

 

19

Chronic leukaemia

2

 

 

1

 

3

Colorectal CA

12

 

 

 

 

12

Breast CA

2

1

 

 

 

3

Head and neck CA

2

 

1

 

 

3

 

 

However, contrary to the relatively infrequent manifestation of pathological changes in the oral mucosa, the presence of the HSV-1 genome in samples obtained from the oral cavity was revealed in a much greater number of patients. HSV-1 was detected in 28 patients (70%), versus 7 (17.5%) patients only, presenting oral complications (Table III).

Table III. Presence of Viral Genome in Samples Obtained at the Initial Examination 

 

PCR +

PCR -

Patients with oral complications

7

2

9

Patients without oral complications

21

10

31

28

12

40

 

 

At control examination, the changes localized on the oral mucosa appeared to be more frequent. Their presence was detected in 26 patients (65%). The occurrence of oral mucositis was mostly found in patients suffering from acute and chronic leukaemia. 17 out of 22 leukaemia patients (77%) had oral mucosa damage at the control examination. The pathological conditions seen on the oral mucosa of these patients were not only more frequent, but they were also more severe than in patients with other malignancies. At the control examination, exanthema, vesicles and erosion of the oral mucosa, as well as ulcerations were observed, while one patient presented necrosis of the oral mucosa. Oral mucositis marked as grade 2 or 3 was detected in 4 patients with colorectal cancer. In 2 female patients suffering from breast cancer, oral mucositis was scored as grade 1 and grade 2. Changes of grade 1 or 2 in the oral mucosa also appeared in 3 patients with head and neck cancer (Table IV).

Table IV. Mucositis Severity at Control Examination According to WHO Criteria 

 

 

Mucositis severity

0

I

II

III

IV

Acute leukaemia

5

5

5

3

1

19

Chronic leukaemia

 

 

1

2

 

  3

Colorectal CA

8

2

2

 

 

12

Breast CA

1

1

1

 

 

  3

Head and neck CA

 

2

1

 

 

  3

 

At control examination the presence of HSV-1 was detected in 35 cases (87.5%), 23 showing oral complications (57.5%). Five patients (12.5%) did not reveal the presence of virus (Table V). None of the samples was positive to HSV-2

Table 5. Presence of Viral Genome in Samples Obtained  at  Control Examination 

 

PCR +

PCR -

Patients with oral complications

23

3

26

Patients without oral complications

12

2

14

35

5

40

 

The differences between the presence of viral genome on initial and control examination were not statistically significant.

 

Discussion 

Until recently, no attention has been paid to viral infections in patients with malignancies because lesions of viral etiology present on the oral mucosa of these patients often have an atypical clinical picture, and are consequently misdiagnosed. 2,14,5 Thanks to new, sensitive and specific tests, it has been shown that oral infections of viral origin are frequent in patients suffering from malignancies, especially in patients with haematological malignancies. 11,10,6 Numerous studies point out to frequent infections of viral etiology (incidence ranging between 50% and 90%), mostly with Herpesviridae, localized in the oropharyngeal region. The studies have demonstrated that oral infections caused by these viruses can have a severe clinical picture. 5,16 The data obtained from available sources are in accordance with the results obtained in our study, which revealed a high incidence of cases positive to HSV-1, both on initial (70.0%) and control examination (87.5%). HSV-1 infection was found in patients with oral lesions but also without any change on the oral mucosa suggesting that asymptomatic viral shedding is very common among patients with malignancies.   

 

It should be also emphasized that certain malignancies are more prone to viral infections than others. Some studies point to the fact that viral infections localized in the oral cavity are more frequent in patients with acute leukemia than in patients suffering from other forms of malignancies. Barrett et al estimate that 40% of patients with acute leukemia have a recurrent herpetic infection in the oral cavity during chemotherapy.1 Epstein et al presented in their study an even higher percentage of  herpetic infections. 7 With almost 80% of HSV-1 positive cases among patients suffering from leukaemia, the results of our research are in agreement with the data from other studies dealing with hematological malignancies. A high rate of HSV-1 detection in oral changes can be attributed by the application of sensitive PCR techniques.

 

The majority of authors agree on the fact that the greatest number of infections occur owing to reactivation of the latent virus in the host's body. 12,11 Primary herpetic infections in patients with malignancies are extremely rare, since they occur during the early years of life, regardless of the immune status.

 

Conclusion

Oral infections caused by herpes simplex viruses in patients undergoing chemotherapy have a much higher occurrence than previously estimated. Immune dysfunction, as a product of primary malignancy and application of chemotherapy, represents an enhancing factor for the reactivation of HSV infection. It can lead to a manifested herpetic infection that affects oral mucosa previously damaged by the cytotoxic action of chemotherapy, but it can also lead to asymptomatic shedding.  Individuals with immunodeficiency, together with patients suffering from malignancies, are often at risk of virus dissemination in the body, which in some cases leads to lethal outcome. For that reason, the choice of sensitive, specific and rapid laboratory methods for virus detection is a crucial prerequisite for an adequate therapy administration.  By using PCR methodology, minute quantities of viral genome can be confirmed in various types of biological specimens within a very short time, which can occasionally be of crucial importance to the course of the disease and survival of the patient.

 

References 

1. Barrett PA. A long-term prospective clinical study of oral complications during conventional chemotherapy for acute leukemia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1987; 63: 313-6

2. Birek C, Patterson B, Maximiw WC et al. EBV and HSV infections in patient who had undergone bone marrow transplantation: oral manifestations and diagnosis by in situ nucleic acid hybridization. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 68: 612-617

3. Contreras A, Slots J. Typing of herpes simplex virus from human periodontium. Oral Microbiol Immunolo 2001: 16: 63-64

4. Epstein JB, Gangbar SJ. Oral mucosal lesions in patients receiving treatment for leukemia, J Oral Med 1987; 42: 132-137

5. Epstein JB. Oral complications of cancer chemotherapy: etiology, recognition and management Can J Oncol 1992; 2: 83-95

6. Epstein JB, Ransier A, Sherlock CH,  et al. Aciclovir prophylaxis of oral herpes

virus during bone marrow transplantation. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 1996; 32[B]: 158-162

7. Epstein JB, Sherlock C, Page JL et al. Clinical study of herpes simplex virus infection in leukemia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990; 70: 38-43

8. Ohrn KEO, Wahlin YB, Sjoden PO. Oral status during radiotherapy and chemotherapy: a descriptive study of patient experiences and occurrence of oral complications. Support Care Cancer 2001; 9: 247-257

9. Peterson DE, Oral infection. Support Care Cancer 1999; 7: 217-218

10. Redding SW, Montgomery MT. Acyclovir prophylaxis for oral herpes simplex virus infection in patients with bone marrow transplants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1989; 67: 680-683

11. Redding SW. Role of herpes simplex virus reactivation in chemotherapy-induced oral mucositis.  NCI Monogr 1990; 9: 103-105

12. Schubert MM, Peterson D.E, Flournoy N, et al. Oral and pharyngeal herpes simplex virus infection after allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: Analysis of factors associated with infection. Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1990; 70: 286-293

13. Scully C, Epstein JB. Oral health care for the cancer patient. Eur J Cancer B Oral Oncol 1996; 32[B]: 281-292

14. Sonis S, Kunz A. Impact of improved dental services on the frequency of oral complications of cancer therapy for patients with non-head-and-neck malignancies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1988; 65: 19-22

15. Spijkervet FKL, Saene HKF van, Panders AK, et al. Scoring irradiation mucositis in head and neck cancer patients. J Oral Pathol Med 1989; 18: 167-171

16.Wirth K, Fetscher S, Neumann-Haefelin D, et al. Lethal systemic herpes simplex virus type 1 infection during chemotherapy for acute lymphoblastic leukaemia. Br J Haematol. 1999; 104: 197-198

 

Back to February Contents