An Audit of Neonatal Respiratory Morbidity Following Elective Caesarean Section at Term.

SMJ 2003 49(1): 22-25

Nicoll AE, Black C, Powls A, Mackenzie F.

Princess Royal Maternity Hospital, 16 Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, G31 2ER.

 

Abstract:

Background:  Studies have suggested that a reduction in neonatal respiratory morbidity may be achieved by delaying elective caesarean section until 39 weeks gestation.  In 1997 staff at the Glasgow Royal Maternity Hospital were concerned at the level of neonatal respiratory morbidity following elective caesarean section. 

Aims:  To determine the extent of neonatal respiratory morbidity following elective caesarean section at term.  Then to present the findings, make recommendations and perform a repeat analysis.

Methods:  A retrospective analysis of all elective caesarean sections at term between October 1996 and October 1997 was performed.  Labour ward, operating theatre and SCBU records were examined, followed by maternal and infant case note review.  The gestational age at the time of caesarean section and any neonatal respiratory morbidity was recorded. The results were subsequently presented at a perinatal morbidity meeting and a recommendation made to delay elective sections until 39 weeks gestation.  The audit was repeated between June 1999 and June 2000.  

Results:  The first cycle of the audit showed significantly lower rates of neonatal admissions with advancing gestation (p < 0.001). There was also a reduction in the number of infants requiring oxygen (p = 0.001), the number of infants requiring intensive care admission (p=0.001) and ventilation (p = 0.003) with advancing gestation.

In the second cycle of the audit there was a significant decrease in the number of elective caesarean sections performed prior to 39 weeks gestation (51% vs. 26%) (p < 0.0001).  There were fewer neonatal admissions with respiratory morbidity between the two phases of the audit (26/292 vs. 18/327) (RR = 0.62, 95%CI 0.34 - 1.1).  There was also a reduction in the number of infants requiring oxygen (RR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.23 - 1.06) the number of infants requiring intensive care admission (RR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.15 - 1.29) and the number of infants requiring ventilation (RR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.1 - 1.47).

Conclusion:  A reduction in neonatal respiratory morbidity can be achieved by delaying elective caesarean section until 39 weeks gestation.

 

Introduction:

The establishment of lung function at birth is dependent upon removal of fluid that fills the fetal lungs in utero, the institution and maintenance of a functional residual capacity and the development of a ventilation-perfusion relationship that allows successful gas transfer between the alveoli and the circulation.  These changes occur within the first few seconds of life as the newborn infant begins to breathe.  Any disruption to this complex physiological process can cause neonatal respiratory distress. 

 

Despite appropriate gestational age it is well recognised that infants delivered by caesarean section have significantly greater respiratory morbidity than those delivered vaginally 1, 2, 3, 4, 5.  The timing of elective caesarean section would appear to be a crucial factor in the prevention of neonatal respiratory illness.  Delaying elective caesarean section until 39 weeks gestation can reduce neonatal respiratory morbidity1. 

 

In 1997 at the Glasgow Royal Maternity Hospital obstetric and paediatric staff were concerned that a significant number of neonates were being admitted to the Special Care Baby Unit with respiratory distress following elective caesarean section.  Therefore an audit of respiratory illness in neonates following delivery by elective caesarean section was conducted. 

 

Methods:

A retrospective audit of infants delivered by elective caesarean section was conducted.  The aims of the audit were:

  1. To identify gestations at which elective caesarean section were being performed.

  2. To identify extent of neonatal respiratory morbidity.

  1. To compare levels of neonatal morbidity with other published figures.

  2. To present the findings, make recommendations for future practice.

  3. Re-audit to establish whether or not practice had changed.

Information regarding deliveries at the Glasgow Royal Maternity Hospital between October 1996 and October 1997 was obtained.  The labour ward register of births and the operating theatre books were used to identify those women who had been delivered by elective caesarean section.  An elective caesarean section was defined as one with which the timing of delivery could be postponed, i.e. one in which prolonging the pregnancy would not pose risks to the mother or fetus.  The admission book for the Special Care Baby Unit was then examined to identify those infants who had been admitted to the unit following delivery by elective caesarean section. 

 

The maternal and infant case records were then analysed and the relevant information was extracted.  From the maternal notes, information was gathered about the gestation at which the operation was performed; the estimated date of delivery being the first day of the woman’s last menstrual period + 280 days.  An ultrasound scan was performed before 20 weeks gestation to confirm gestational age.  If there was a discrepancy of greater than 1 week then the estimated date of delivery was calculated using ultrasound measurements.   

 

From the infant records information was obtained about the respiratory illness and the duration of stay in the neonatal unit.  The respiratory diagnosis was based on serial chest radiographs and clinical course. Information was obtained on oxygen and ventilation requirements and their duration.

 

The results of the first audit cycle were presented to obstetric and paediatric staff at the Glasgow Royal Maternity Hospital in January 1998 at a perinatal meeting.  At this time obstetric staff were recommended to delay elective caesarean section until 39 weeks gestation unless there was a clear obstetric indication to deliver earlier.  No other specific action was taken to ensure compliance with this recommendation.  The audit was then repeated, examining elective caesarean deliveries at the Glasgow Royal Maternity Hospital between June 1999 and June 2000.

 

Statistical analysis was performed using MinitabTM for Windows version 13.  Linear regression models were used to analyse the effects of gestation at the time of delivery on the frequency of neonatal respiratory illness.  Mann-Whitney and Fishers Exact Tests were used to compare the 2 groups.  A p-value of less than 0.05 represented statistical significance. 

 

Results:

Cycle 1 (1996 - 1997):

Between October 1996 and October 1997 there were 4409 live-births at the Glasgow Royal Maternity Hospital.  Of these 292 (6.6%) infants were delivered by elective caesarean section. 51% of elective caesarean sections were performed at a gestational age of less than 39 weeks.  26 (8.8%) infants required admission to the neonatal unit with respiratory illness following elective caesarean delivery (Table I).  The median duration of time spent in the neonatal unit was 5.5 days (range 2 - 20 days).  

 

In the first audit cycle one infant was admitted to the neonatal unit with TTN following delivery by elective caesarean section at 39 weeks gestation.  This infant remained on the unit for 47 days because of failure to thrive and poor feeding, which were not related to its initial respiratory illness.  As this tended to severely skew the data for duration of stay, this figure was omitted from the analysis. 

 

There was a reduction in the number of neonatal admissions with respiratory morbidity with advancing gestation (p < 0.001) (Table I / Figure I).  Increasing gestational age at the time of elective caesarean section was associated with a significant reduction in the number of infants requiring oxygen (p = 0.001), the number of infants requiring intensive care admission (p=0.001) and the number of infants requiring ventilation (p = 0.003) (Figure I).

 

Cycle 2 (1999 - 2000):

Between June 1999 and June 2000 there were 4829 live-births at the Glasgow Royal Maternity Hospital.  Of these 327 (6.8%) infants were delivered by elective caesarean section.  26% of elective caesarean sections were performed < 39 weeks, a reduction of 25% compared to the first audit cycle (p < 0.0001) (Figure II).  18 (5.5%) infants required admission to the neonatal unit with respiratory illness following elective caesarean delivery (Relative Risk = 0.62, 95% CI 0.34 - 1.1) (Table II).

 

The median duration of time spent in the neonatal unit was 5 days (range 2 - 12 days).  In the second audit cycle one infant was admitted to the neonatal unit with respiratory distress following delivery by elective caesarean section at 39 weeks gestation.  This infant remained on the unit for 43 days because of breathing and feeding difficulties secondary to Pierre-Robin Sequence.  Again this tended to skew the data for duration of stay, and this figure was therefore omitted from the analysis. 

 

There was a reduction in the number of infants requiring oxygen (RR = 0.5, 95% CI 0.23 - 1.06) the number of infants requiring intensive care admission (RR = 0.45, 95% CI 0.15 - 1.29) and the number of infants requiring ventilation (RR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.1 - 1.47) compared to the first audit cycle  (Figure III).  However , none of these differences were statistically significant.

 

Discussion:

Morrison et al 1 reported that the lowest rates for neonatal respiratory morbidity occurred following vaginal delivery (5.3 / 1000 live births).  The amount of neonatal respiratory morbidity increased following caesarean section during labour (12.2 / 1000 live births), and further increased following elective caesarean section (35.5 / 1000 live births).  The audit presented in this paper supports the view that elective caesarean section is a risk factor for neonatal respiratory morbidity.

 

There are a number of reasons why caesarean section might increase the incidence of neonatal respiratory morbidity.    Infants delivered by caesarean section prior to the onset of labour, do not undergo the same stresses as those infants who are delivered vaginally.  During labour, both maternal and fetal catecholamines are produced in response to stress and these are necessary to facilitate the clearance of fetal lung fluid 6.  Infants delivered by caesarean section avoid the opportunity to have lung fluid squeezed out of their chests as they descend through the birth canal and this will also predispose these infants to TTN 6.  Furthermore, an inappropriately timed delivery may result in iatrogenic neonatal respiratory distress syndrome 7, 8.  

 

For singleton pregnancies the lowest risk of neonatal respiratory morbidity following elective caesarean section is beyond 39 weeks gestation 1.  Morrison et al 1 estimated that by delaying elective delivery until 39 weeks, neonatal intensive care units in the UK would have a reduction of greater than one thousand admissions each year.  This has significant financial and social implications, especially as the rate of caesarean section in Scotland continues to increase9.

 

The audit presented in this paper also demonstrates that delaying elective caesarean section until 39 weeks gestation can reduce neonatal respiratory morbidity.  The number of neonates with respiratory illness following caesarean section fell from 8.8% to 5.5%.  There was also a reduction in the number of infants requiring neonatal intensive care admission, assisted ventilation and oxygen therapy between the 2 audit cycles.  However although a reduction in neonatal respiratory illness was seen, these findings were not statistically significant.  It is possible that a type-2 statistical error exists and that the numbers in this audit were too small to demonstrate a statistically significant difference. A power calculation indicates that more than a thousand cases would be required in each audit group to confirm that the differences are statistically significant.

 

Based on the admission rates seen in the first cycle of the audit, if there had been no change in practice, one would have expected 29 infants to be admitted to the neonatal unit with respiratory morbidity (Table III).  Although there was not a statistically significant reduction in the number of neonatal admissions for respiratory distress following elective caesarean section, 11 infants were potentially saved from respiratory illness because of the decision to delay caesarean section until 39 weeks gestation. 

 

The figures for the rates of neonatal respiratory morbidity following elective caesarean section at the Glasgow Royal Maternity Hospital compare favourably to other published figures. Hales et al 10 reported a frequency of respiratory morbidity of 12.4% following elective caesarean delivery.  Cohen et al 11 described a frequency of respiratory morbidity of 11.2% following elective caesarean section prior to the onset of labour.  Hack et al 12 reported a figure of 18%, while Parilla et al 13 reported a frequency of 10.1%.   Sabrine 14 reported that 2.6% of infants delivered by elective caesarean section after 37 weeks gestation in a District General Hospital required neonatal intensive care admission. In the first cycle of the audit 3.4% of infants delivered by elective caesarean section required admission to the neonatal intensive care unit.  This fell to 1.5% in the second part of the audit.

 

In both audit cycles the overall frequency of neonatal respiratory morbidity following elective caesarean delivery decreased with increasing gestation.  There was also a significant tendency for infants who were delivered at later gestations to require less respiratory support.  Although a number of infants still have respiratory illness following elective caesarean at 39 weeks gestation, it appears to be of a less serious nature.  Again this provides further evidence that elective caesarean sections should be delayed wherever possible until after 39 weeks gestation.

 

The conclusion from the first cycle of the audit was to delay elective caesarean section until 39 weeks gestation unless there was a clear obstetric indication to deliver earlier.  Obstetric staff were made aware of this recommendation at a department meeting at which the majority of senior obstetric staff were present. Despite this 84  / 327 (25.7%) infants were delivered by elective caesarean section before 39 weeks gestation in the second audit cycle.  No other specific action was taken to ensure compliance with this recommendation and this lack of reinforcement is likely to have contributed to the number of elective deliveries occurring before 39 weeks gestation in the second audit cycle.

 

It was clear that when the first audit cycle was presented that there was a lack of awareness among some obstetric staff of the findings of Morrison et al1.  This undoubtedly contributed to neonatal respiratory morbidity following elective caesarean section in the first audit cycle.  During the second audit cycle a number of caesarean sections were being performed in the days preceding 39 weeks gestation.  It is possible that staff at this time believed that they were close enough to 39 weeks and that it was therefore safe to perform an elective caesarean section.  This audit has shown that days do make a difference in preventing neonatal respiratory morbidity and our colleagues are now aware of this. 

 

At the time that this audit was conducted senior obstetric staff had fixed sessions on labour ward when they were available for caesarean section.  It is not unreasonable that consultants wish their patients to be delivered at a time when they were available.  This again may have contributed to those caesarean sections being performed in the days preceding 39 weeks gestation when consultants may have felt falsely reassured.  

 

In the second audit cycle 11 / 84 (13.1%) infants delivered by elective caesarean section before 39 weeks gestation required admission to the neonatal unit because of respiratory illness.   Could any of this morbidity have been prevented?  In order to assess this we must examine the indications for caesarean section in those infants delivered before 39 weeks who suffered respiratory morbidity. 

 

During the second audit cycle at 37 weeks gestation 3 infants were admitted to the neonatal unit with respiratory morbidity following elective caesarean section.  2 twin infants were delivered by caesarean section because twin 1 was a breech presentation.  The other infant admitted following elective caesarean section at 37 weeks gestation was delivered because of suspected macrosomia.  Indeed the infant weighed 4.8kg, which is significantly greater than the 95th centile for gestational age.

At 38 weeks gestation 8 infants were admitted to the neonatal unit with respiratory morbidity following elective caesarean section.  In 4 of these cases the primary indication for caesarean section was previous caesarean section.  In 1 case the indication was for breech presentation.  Of the others 2 mothers had a history of stillbirth in previous pregnancies and 1 had a history of severe shoulder dystocia with subsequent infant morbidity. 

 

There is evidence that delaying elective caesarean section in twins until 38 weeks gestation can prevent neonatal respiratory morbidity15.  One could therefore argue that in the second audit cycle 2 cases of neonatal respiratory illness following delivery at 37 weeks gestation could have been prevented if their delivery had been delayed until 38 weeks gestation.  Of those infants delivered at 38 weeks gestation in the second audit cycle there are clearly cases that could potentially have been delayed until 39 weeks gestation.  It is therefore possible that an even greater reduction in neonatal respiratory morbidity following elective caesarean section can be achieved.

Following completion of the second audit cycle the findings were presented at departmental, regional and national meetings.  In future greater awareness of the neonatal benefits of delaying elective caesarean section until 39 weeks gestation could be achieved at a department level by displaying poster reminders in antenatal clinics and labour ward, and also in the folder that is used to book elective operative deliveries.  With these changes one would hope that we could further reduce the number of caesarean sections being performed prematurely before 39 weeks gestation and thus further reduce neonatal respiratory morbidity.  

 

By postponing elective caesarean section until 39 weeks gestation, a number of women will present in spontaneous labour.  Morrison et al 1 reported that caesarean delivery following the onset of labour reduces the amount of neonatal respiratory morbidity.  However this must be balanced against the potential risks to both the mother and the fetus, of performing such a delivery outside normal working hours. 

 

Conclusion:

Neonatal respiratory morbidity following elective caesarean section is a significant problem, affecting 8.8% of infants born at the Glasgow Royal Maternity Hospital between October 1996 and October 1997.  Following the first audit this figure fell to 5.5%.  The results of this audit support the view that delaying elective caesarean section until 39 weeks gestation can prevent neonatal respiratory morbidity.  Further work is required to show that delaying elective caesarean section until 39 weeks gestation is not associated with an increase in maternal and neonatal morbidity due to an increase in emergency caesarean sections.

 

References :

  1. Morrison JJ, Rennie JM, Milton PJ.  Neonatal respiratory morbidity and mode of delivery at term: influence of timing of elective caesarean section.  BJOG   1995 102: 101 - 106.

  2.   Bowers SK, MacDonald HM, Shapiro ED.  Prevention of iatrogenic neonatal respiratory distress syndrome: elective repeat caesarean section and spontaneous labour.  Am J Obstet Gynaecol  1982; 143: 186 - 189.

  3.   Nielsen TF, Hokegard KH.  The incidence of acute neonatal respiratory disorders in relation to mode of delivery.  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand  1984; 63 (2): 109 - 114.

  4.   White E, Shy KK, Daling JR.  An investigation of the relationship between caesarean section birth and respiratory distress syndrome of the newborn.  Am J Epidemiol  1985; 121: 651 - 663.

  5.   Curet LB, Zachman AV, Rao AV, Poole WK, Morrison  J, Burkett G.  Effect of mode of delivery on incidence of respiratory distress syndrome.  Int J Obstet Gynecol  1988; 27: 165 - 170.

  6. Greenough A, Lagercrantz H.  Catecholamine abnormalities in transient tachypnoea of the premature newborn.  J Perinat Med  1992; 20 (3): 223 - 226.

  7. Lewins MJ, Whitfield JM, Chance GW.  Neonatal respiratory distress: potential for prevention.  Canadian Med Assoc J  1979; 120 (9): 1076 - 1080.

  8. Schreiner RL, Smith WL, Lemons JA, Golichowski AM, Padilla LM.  Respiratory distress following elective repeat cesarean section.  Am J Obstet Gynaecol  1982; 143: 689 - 692.

  9. Expert Advisory Group on Caesarean Section in Scotland.  Report and Recommendations to the Chief Medical officer of the Scottish Executive Health Department.  Edinburgh: Scottish Executive, Health Department; 2001.

  10. Hales KA, Morgan MA, Thurman GR.  Influence of labor and route of delivery on the frequency of respiratory morbidity in term neonates.  Int J Obstet Gynecol  1993; 43 : 35 - 40.

  11. Cohen M, Carson BS. Respiratory morbidity: benefit of awaiting the onset of labor after elective caesarean section.  Obstet Gynecol  1985; 65: 818 - 824. 

  12. Hack M, Fanaroff AA, Klaus MH, Mendelawitz BD, Merkatz IR. Neonatal respiratory distress following elective delivery.  A preventable disease ?  Am J Obstet Gynaecol  1976; 126 : 43 - 47.

  13. Parilla BV, Dooley SL, Jansen RD, Socol ML, Iatrogenic respiratory distress syndrome following repeat elective caesarean delivery.  Obstet Gynecol   1993; 81: 392 - 395.

  14. Sabrine N.  Elective caesarean can increase the risk to the fetus.  BMJ  2000; 320:  1073 - 1074.

  15. Chasen ST, Madden A, Chervenak FA.  Cesarean delivery of twins and neonatal respiratory disorders.  Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999 181(5 Pt 1):1052-6.

 

Back to February Contents